In a recent decision by the Labour Court Cape Town, an employer’s dismissal of a fundraiser who told the CEO “screw you” — not once, but twice in front of colleagues — was found to be fair and justified. The case, Jenecker v SA Medical & Education Foundation NPC (17 October 2025), confirms that blatant defiance of authority can amount to gross insubordination.
The employee in question arrived late for work, engaged in an argument with the chief executive, and then uttered “screw you” in the presence of other staff members — a direct confrontation with the employer’s leadership. While she denied using the phrase, the testimony of multiple co-workers supported the employer’s version of events.
Both the arbitrator at the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) and the Labour Court found the conduct went well beyond mere rudeness. Instead, they found it a wilful and public rejection of managerial authority.
The Court held that addressing the organisation’s top executive with an explicit “screw you” in front of colleagues is not a trivial matter. It constitutes a serious, deliberate challenge to the employer’s power to direct work and maintain discipline. In other words, it crossed the threshold from ordinary insolence into gross insubordination.
This kind of behaviour undermines the foundational relationship of trust and obedience between employer and employee — and the courts are clear that such behaviour can warrant immediate dismissal where the instruction was lawful and the employee’s defiance wilful.
The employee’s review application was dismissed. The arbitration award (upholding the dismissal) was confirmed. The employer’s decision to end the employment contract stood — without an award of costs to the employee.
When an employee publicly and repeatedly tells a CEO “screw you,” the employer is within its rights to treat that as gross insubordination. The Labour Court’s decision underscores a straightforward truth: insubordination that attacks the core of managerial authority can justify dismissal.
This decision reinforces that blatant disrespect toward senior leadership — especially when done publicly — can justify dismissal without the need for progressive discipline.
The conduct in this case included:
The Court confirmed this behaviour directly undermines employer authority and breaks trust, which lies at the heart of the employment relationship.
HR & Employer Insights and Action Points
Key Principle | What It Means in Practice |
Gross insubordination may warrant dismissal | Not all misconduct must be corrected with warnings first. |
Public defiance worsens the severity | Loss of respect and breakdown in hierarchy impacts the entire workplace. |
Clear instructions must be obeyed | Ensure instructions are lawful and reasonable — document them. |
Witness evidence is crucial | Get written statements immediately following the incident. |
Maintain a proper process | Even serious cases require a fair hearing and opportunity to respond. |
HR should ensure that the following policies explicitly cover:
Policy wording should link these behaviours to possible dismissal for a first offence in serious cases.
When an employee intentionally disrespects senior leadership in front of others, the employer is not required to tolerate it — or give multiple warnings.
Don’t wait until a “screw you” moment lands on your desk!
Make sure your policies, procedures, and disciplinary processes can stand up to scrutiny. Chat to us today — we’ll help you handle workplace misconduct the right way.
Adapted by HR Consult, specialists in South African labour and employment law compliance.
A Proud HR Consult, a division of BEE Analyst, is a proud Level 4 B-BBEE contributor.