Restructuring is a normal part of business — whether driven by cost pressures, new technology, or operational changes. But when roles shift or fall away, many employers confuse two important concepts: Redundancy and Retrenchment.
These terms may sound similar, but they have very different legal meanings under South African labour law. If they’re misunderstood or applied incorrectly, employers can face unfair dismissal claims, financial penalties, and reputational damage.
A recent Labour Court judgment, De Weijer v Babcock Africa Services (Pty) Ltd (2025), has added welcome clarity. The case explores when a position can be declared redundant and what a fair Section 189 process looks like in practice.
This article breaks down the ruling and shares practical guidance from an HR Consult perspective to help employers navigate restructuring with confidence.
During the COVID-19 period, Babcock Africa Services restructured and identified the Property Manager role as no longer required. The employee disagreed, arguing that many of his tasks were still being handled by other staff — therefore, his job “still existed”.
The Court found in favour of the employer.
Key Principle:
A position may be redundant even if some of the tasks continue elsewhere in the business.
The Court emphasised that the law distinguishes between a job and the tasks within it. A role can fall away due to operational changes, even if its duties are absorbed into other positions.
This distinction is crucial for employers planning restructures.
Based on the Labour Court’s reasoning and the principles within the Labour Relations Act (LRA), a position is genuinely redundant when:
Redundancy is about the job, not the employee — and not about whether tasks still exist.
In the Babcock matter, the employer’s process was highlighted as an example of compliance done well. They:
The Court confirmed that procedural fairness is just as important as the operational rationale.
Tip: A retrenchment is judged on the quality of the process — not the label you attach to it.
Even when employers follow Section 189 correctly, errors often arise when calculating severance pay.
In this case, the employer calculated severance using only the basic salary, excluding several BCEA-defined remuneration items such as:
As a result, the employer was ordered to pay an additional R77,370.57.
Important:
Severance pay must be based on total remuneration as defined in the BCEA — not only basic salary.
Term | Meaning | Legal Reference |
Redundancy | A position is no longer required due to operational changes. | LRA, Section 189 |
Retrenchment | The dismissal of an employee because their position is redundant. | LRA & BCEA |
In simple terms:
To minimise risk, avoid these frequent errors:
Proper planning and documentation protect the business from unfair dismissal claims.
Restructuring can be complex and sensitive — but with the right guidance, it doesn’t need to be overwhelming.
HR Consult assists businesses with:
A fair process not only protects your business legally — it supports dignity, trust, and transparency in the workplace.
Not sure if your restructuring process meets legal requirements?
📌 HR Consult can help. Contact us for reliable labour law support and practical HR solutions.
Office: 012 997 0037
E-mail: info@hrconsultsa.co.za
Adapted by HR Consult, specialists in South African labour and employment law compliance.
A Proud HR Consult, a division of BEE Analyst, is a proud Level 4 B-BBEE contributor.